Post by Falcon Boy on Mar 18, 2006 10:34:20 GMT -5
What set up should one go with for a 500g flight weight bird?
The backpack weighs approx 4g powermax i think 7g 1/3n is 8g i think
do i really need two transmitters? opinions please, i dont want a bird to be loaded down with weight, but i definatly want the best chance of getting it back
right now im leaning towards backpack 1/3n FMV
Falcon Boy Apprentice Falconry Administrator
Ethics make the individual, not the other way around.
When through the woods and forest glades I wander And hear the birds sing sweetly in the trees When I look down from lofty mountain grandeur And hear the brook and feel the gentle breeze
You can also do 2 leg mount transmitters. I have used Merlins on both legs . They are pretty light. Most of the time, the falcons don't bother the leg mounts once they get used to wearing them. The backpak would be the best weight distribution in my opinion.
Also, the backpack seems to always keep the transmitter in a good transmitting positon, ie. not on the ground! It works awesome in my opinion. Ant transmitter hooked to that cant be beat!
I'm going for backpack too, and I don't personally think you need two systems, but if you're really cautious about loosing your bird then whatever you deem neccesary.
When through the woods and forest glades I wander And hear the birds sing sweetly in the trees When I look down from lofty mountain grandeur And hear the brook and feel the gentle breeze
Post by Falcon Boy on Mar 18, 2006 17:21:59 GMT -5
The bird is a prairie x peregrine tiercel that is going to be transferred to me once i upgrade my permit in August/September. I have chose the backpack mount becuase of what has been brought up, weight distribution and transmitter position when the bird is on the ground. Half the reason i posted this was about the 2 transmitter thing, do i even need two? I was hoping i could just use one long-lifed transmitter like the 1/3n FMV. Also, i'd rather avoid leg mounts, i find them ugly and also believe they impeed a birds footing. It also has a higher chance of electrocution if it lands on a power pole for some reason.
Falcon Boy Apprentice Falconry Administrator
Ethics make the individual, not the other way around.
If you are flying a wild trapped bird and there are more birds available,then you probably don't need 2 transmitters. If you are flying a captive bred bird that you have paid money for and you are concerned about losing that bird and your hard earned money then you probably do need 2 transmitters. If I lose the eagle I am flying now, I have to wait another year and do all kinds of paper work, then go all the way to Wyoming to trap another one, then I think it is necessay to use at least 2 transmitters. That is still no guarentee that I will get him back every time. As good a falconer as you think you might be, you just never know what is going to happen. My friend just lost a gyr/prairie falcon that he has flown for 6 years. He only had one transmitter on the bird and the bird ended up pulling the transmitter off his leg. We found the transmitter in the foothills yesterday and today we went back to the same area with a balloon and a starling , but, the falcon was no where to be found. If he had another tranmitter on the bird, he would have had a better chance of retreiving it. That doesn't mean that the falcon would not have pulled the 2nd one off, but, your chances are better with 2 transmitters.
I don't even bother with transmitters. This is not because I am a bad falconry, or foolhardy, it's because I have no money. I would prefer to have absoloutly full confidence in my bird and only have on backpack transimitter than have a couple of leg mounts.
Another point to make FB is that the bird is less likely to be able to pull a backpack off than a leg mount.
When through the woods and forest glades I wander And hear the birds sing sweetly in the trees When I look down from lofty mountain grandeur And hear the brook and feel the gentle breeze